Elsevier

Quaternary International

Volume 526, 20 August 2019, Pages 39-48
Quaternary International

A geoarchaeological reassessment of the co-occurrence of the oldest Acheulean and Oldowan in a fluvial ecotone from lower middle Bed II (1.7ma) at Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.09.037Get rights and content

Abstract

The coexistence of the oldest Acheulean and Oldowan industries means that the appearance of the former cannot be due to an anagenetic development from the latter. At Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, both industries are found within the same chronostratigraphic unit, the Lower Augitic Sandstone (LAS; 1.7 Ma), at HWK, HWK-E, HWK-EE (Oldowan) and FLK-W and FLK-N (Acheulean). Recently, McHenry and Stanistreet (2018) and Stanistreet et al. (2018) have argued that the Acheulean site of FLK West is actually located within a more recent stratigraphic unit, the Middle Augitic Sandstone (MAS). If so, the Acheulean could potentially have evolved from the Oldowan anagenetically. We test this hypothesis by reviewing the stratigraphy of the LAS from the HWK area to the FLK-W site. Hay's (1976) previous work stresses the continuity of the LAS from HWK-EE to FLK-NN, and stratigraphic and sedimentological evidence indicates that while the MAS has eroded away, the LAS is continuous throughout the study area. According to Hay (1976), Uribelarrea et al. (2017) and this work, the LAS is present at HWK-EE, HWK-E, HWK, HWK-W, FLK-S, FLK-W, FLK-N and FLK-NN. The emergence of the Acheulean at Olduvai Gorge ca. 1.7Ma and its coexistence with the Oldowan thus demonstrates a cladogenetic, rather than an anagenetic, origin for the Acheulean. This has implications for the behavioral and biological interpretations of the origin and co-existence of both types of industries.

Introduction

Two paradigms compete to explain the emergence of the Acheulean stone tool industry. The older, which is inspired by traditional Darwinian gradualism where stone tool industries and hominins co-evolved, presents a linear evolutionary path. This anagenetic conception posits that Homo habilis produced the Oldowan technology, which evolved and was replaced by the Acheulean technology associated with Homo erectus/ergaster (e.g., Leakey, 1951, De la Torre and Mora, 2014; De la Torre, 2016; Sánchez-Yustos et al., 2016). An alternative cladogenetic view maintains that the Acheulean technology emerged and co-existed with the Oldowan during hundreds of thousands of years and that both technologies reflect different adaptive behaviors rather than just different cognitive skills and, therefore, different hominins (e.g., Leakey, 1971; Heinzelin et al., 2000, Díez-Martín and Eren, 2012; Domínguez-Rodrigo et al., 2014, Diez-Martín et al., 2015; Uribelarrea et al., 2017).

The older anagenetic paradigm has been revised by redefining both industries on technological grounds, whereas the cladogenetic paradigm rests on a typological concept of both industries (Leakey, 1971; Baena et al., 2012). This handicaps tests of either approach because they both abide by different conceptual arguments. The anagenetic conceptual framework is cognitive, whereas the cladogenetic approach is functional. The epistemologically-unwarranted cognitive approach has lead lithic experts to identify some assemblages as Acheulean based simply on the single occurrence of a handaxe or a large format artefact among thousands of small flakes and cores (De la Torre and Mora, 2014). However, typological approaches that use arbitrary frequency thresholds of large format tools in any given assemblage to qualify as Acheulean are also heuristically problematic (Leakey, 1971). The fact is that there are assemblages with large numbers of handaxes and other large format tools and others that are dominated by cores and small flakes that most certainly reflect different behaviors. At Olduvai, the former occur in different palaeogeographic settings than the latter (Hay, 1976; Domínguez-Rodrigo et al., 2017; Uribelarrea et al., 2017; Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2018).

Recently, it has been argued that, technologically, the transition of the Oldowan to the Acheulean occurs at Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) in the middle of middle Bed II in the stratigraphic unit referred to as the Middle Augitic Sandstone (MAS) (McHenry and Stanistreet, 2018; Stanistreet et al., 2018). On the other hand, Diez-Martín et al. (2015) argue that the transition occurs in lower Bed II, in the Lower Augitic Sandstone (LAS), as seen at the FLK West1 Acheulean site at ca. 1.7 Ma (Diez-Martín et al., 2015). FLK West was inferred to be pene-contemporaneous with HWK, HWK E and, HWK EE (Uribelarrea et al., 2017), all of them classified as Oldowan (Leakey, 1971; De la Torre et al., 2018). This would support a cladogenetic evolution of the Acheulean. However, McHenry and Stanistreet (2018) and Stanistreet et al. (2018) argue that FLK West is located stratigraphically higher due to the erosion of the LAS by the MAS, which, according to these authors, is associated with the overlying Bird Print Tuff (BPT). Should that be true, then the Acheulean industry could potentially have evolved from the Oldowan anagenetically. Here, we test this hypothesis by reviewing the stratigraphy from the HWK area to the FLK West site, especially between the two outcrops where, we will show, the MAS, rather than the LAS, disappears by erosion. This reinforces previous adscription of FLK West to the lower part of the sequence.

Section snippets

Methods

This study uses a standard stratigraphic model, which applies classic stratigraphic techniques: a) strata identification, genesis interpretation, and local stratigraphic succession, b) the movement from a local to a regional scale through correlation of different stratigraphic and tectonosedimentary units, c) a detailed stratigraphic interpretation that includes the reconstruction of depositional environments, lateral extension, stratigraphic relationships with other units, and even the

Geological framework: Lower to Middle Bed II between HWK and FLK-W, 1.7 ma

Bed II is especially interesting since it displays a wide variety of sedimentary environments, including lacustrine, fluvial, Aeolian, and volcanic facies in a very tectonically active setting that was influenced considerably by the geometry of sedimentary units. Lower Bed II is particularly important since it contains the oldest Acheulean industry at Olduvai Gorge (1.7 ma; Diez-Martín et al., 2015). According to Hay (1976), during the beginning of Bed II, the Olduvai basin was dominated by the

LTK section, locality 44

This locality is equivalent to section 11 and HWK-W from Hay (1996) and with HWK-W 16, Loc. 44 from McHenry and Stanistreet (2018). At this locality (Fig. 1), the base of Bed II up to the LD is represented by 3 m of waxy claystone (Hay, 1976). Locally, earthy claystone levels <1 m in thickness can be found since these deposits are in a transitional facies as defined by Hay (1996). Tuff IIA (<50 cm) is embedded in the upper half of this clay unit, 1.5–2.0 m above Tuff IF (Fig. 3).

  • Unit 1

    Lowermost Bed

Stratigraphical correlation

Between LTK and LR, there seem to be no major lithological or facies changes, and the described units are found in the same stratigraphical position in relation to Tuff IF (Fig. 4). The basal deposit of Bed II is a waxy claystone in most places around the junction. According to Hay (1996), in this area, waxy claystones form most of the interval between tuffs IF and IIA in the northern area, whereas they interfinger with earthy claystones in the southern part. The interbedded Lemuta member,

Richard Hay's (1976) stratigraphy

According to Hay (1976), Middle and Lower Bed II has probably the most complex geology at Olduvai, particularly in the central zone, where the “Eastern fluvial-lacustrine deposits” include a wide variety of sedimentary environments (lacustrine, fluvial, and aeolian) with base level changes and tectonic activity. Hay (1976) pays special attention to the interval between the LD and the BPT, describing five evolutionary stages, summarized below (Pages 87–91 and Figs. 26, 27 and 28 in Hay, 1976).

Conclusions

According to Hay (1976), the LAS are present at HWK-EE, HWK-E, HWK, HWK-W, FLK-S, FLK-W, FLK-N, and FLK-NN. Between HWK and FLK-W the palaeosurface prior to the BPT erodes the MAS from Loc. 44 northwards and also partially erodes Tuff IIB at Loc. 45d. The MAS unit and Tuff IIB are not present at FLK-W. The MAS unit is typically lacustrine, whereas the LAS unit is fluvial and fluvial-lacustrine and, therefore, they are distinguishable. LAS overlies the LD practically throughout the gorge, while

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare having no conflict of interest.

We don't have conflict of interest, we make a scientific critique.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Tanzanian Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), the Department of Antiquities, the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority in the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism and the National Museums of Tanzania for permission to conduct research at Olduvai Gorge and at the National Museum in Dar es Salaam. We also thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for funding this research (HAR2017-82463-C4-1-P) and the Ministry of Culture for funding our research

References (22)

  • I. Baena et al.

    Testing cognitive skills in Early Pleistocene hominins: an analysis of the concepts of hierarchization and predetermination in the lithic assemblages of Type Section (Peninj, Tanzania)

    (2012)
  • Cited by (13)

    • After the emergence of the Acheulean at Melka Kunture (Upper Awash, Ethiopia): From Gombore IB (1.6 Ma) to Gombore Iγ (1.4 Ma), Gombore Iδ (1.3 Ma) and Gombore II OAM Test Pit C (1.2 Ma)

      2023, Quaternary International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Currently, there is some consensus that the technological and typological characteristics differencing the so-called Developed Oldowan from the Acheulean reflect techno-economic and functional variations, rather than biological or cultural factors (Isaac, 1969; Stiles, 1977, 1979; Gowlett, 1988; Domínguez-Rodrigo et al., 2005; Semaw et al., 2009; Díez-Martín and Eren, 2012; Gallotti, 2013; de la Torre and Mora, 2014; Santonja et al., 2014; Rubio-Jara et al., 2017; Gallotti and Mussi, 2018; Sánchez-Yustos et al., 2018). However, Semaw et al. (2020) recently favoured again Leakey's hypothesis while Uribelarrea et al. (2017; 2019) suggest the co-occurrence of Oldowan and Early Acheulean in the same landscape during the initial emerging Acheulean, i.e. during the deposition of lowermost Bed II at Olduvai. The small bifacial tool just pre-dating 1.2 Ma at Gombore II OAM Test Pit C and the shaping flake dated between 1.2 and 0.87 Ma (Fig. 15 a-b) suggest that by then the hominins had refined their skills in shaping handaxes.

    • The evolution of stone tool technology at Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): Contributions from the Olduvai Paleoanthropology and Paleoecology Project

      2022, Anthropologie (France)
      Citation Excerpt :

      The LAS fluvial system included a network of braided channels flowing SE-NW towards the central paleo-lake and merging progressively in fewer water courses downstream. FLK West is precisely deposited in one of these downstream channels closer to the lake margin (Uribelarrea et al., 2014, 2019). The FLK West channel is ∼40 m wide and has a maximum depth of 1.2 m and it is infilled with six stratigraphic levels fining upwards (from bottom to top, L6 to L1).

    • New excavations in the MNK Skull site, and the last appearance of the Oldowan and Homo habilis at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania

      2021, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
      Citation Excerpt :

      No stratigraphic correlations with Lower/Middle Bed II tuffs were originally made (Díez-Martín et al., 2015), so others (McHenry and Stanistreet, 2018; Stanistreet et al., 2018b) placed this handaxe-rich assemblage in the Middle Augitic Sandstone (MAS), which would position this site stratigraphically above late Oldowan occurrences such as HWK EE (de la Torre et al., 2018c) and MNK Skull (this paper). This interpretation has been vigorously contested (Uribelarrea et al., 2019), who now identify one of their previously uncorrelated tuffs as the BPT, and the artefact-bearing deposits underneath as LAS. Should these correlations be correct, late Oldowan assemblages in LAS such as HWK EE (de la Torre et al., 2018c) and FLK North Sandy Conglomerate (Leakey, 1971) would be coeval with early Acheulean sites like the one at the FLK West Locality (Díez-Martín et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text